To Egypt? Again?

 Among the many, many things I did not know about the Bible and Biblical history is this interesting, stirring fact:  part of Israel was re-subjugated to Egypt during the time of Judah’s kings and prophets, namely Josiah and Jeremiah.  Please excuse my ignorance (I must’ve missed that somehow in Bible class), and then pause for a moment to ponder the utter devastation that event must have meant for the people.  For an ancient Hebrew, oh-so-aware of the prior Egyptian slavery and the famed exodus from it, surely the depression would have been dark and abiding.  The very thought of ever again being subservient to a pharoah!  And yet it happened.

Whatever could such a move of God mean?

What could YHVH, the great, delivering God of Israel, possibly have had in His almighty mind in letting this happen?

Whatever the particular lessons the people were to learn in their new bout with Egypt, and in the succeeding time as deportees to Babylon, one thing seems clear:  it is futile to place one’s faith in an earthly kingdom, including but not limited to the human kings and physical kingdoms of Israel.

I commend applying that truth universally.  In other words, it is not only appropriate to consider ancient Israel with this in mind, but also, every other geopolitical scenario in every other era should be considered with the sovereignty of God (not human rulers) in mind.  Do you harbor any present trust or distrust related to current government(s)?  Do you entertain future hopes of a physical kingdom in Israel?  Thoughts such as these must also be tempered by the reality that the Kingdom of God is, and has always been, principally a spiritual reality.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “To Egypt? Again?

  1. Via Facebook
    Edward Wilson: Most of the time we do not consider the regional politics in the Bible stories we read. It is often sort of between the lines because it is not directly addressed, as not the main reason for the writings. For instance, in modern terms David operated for years as a local warlord with his own militia, but it is seldom put that way.

    My reply: Yeah. Interesting. Would some re-framing like that be offensive? I suppose it’s just that we are aided by seeing just about anything in any kind of fresh perspective. In other words, David does not cease being the great King David if you see him as a regional warlord, but one’s understanding of the total picture is enhanced with new insights like that. Thanks.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s